Then again, this is an engineering sample and the 10900K here is running on a water-cooled setup, so it’s not exactly a fair comparison. Not really all that impressive considering that the latter features two additional cores over the 10900K. Out of the box, the 3700X, 3600X and 3600 achieve similar quad core speeds but the 16 threaded 3700X is 30 faster at multi-core computations than the 12 threaded 3600X.Comparing the 3700X to Intel’s i7-9700K shows that, when overclocked, the 3700X is 26 faster at 64-core computations but 13 slower for gaming and. The multi-threaded scores are relatively tamer, being 15% faster than the 3900X, not surprising considering that the core counts are unchanged: SourceĬompared to the Core i9-10900K running at its thermal velocity boost of 5.3GHz the single-core scores are nearly identical, with 5900X being 16% faster on the multi-threaded front. The 3700X is a 320 USD 8-core, 16-thread mid-range Ryzen 3000 series CPU. This version does also add the GPU TDP in the display page. Keep in mind that this chip is not recognized by CPU-Z, so the retail version may be even faster in the single-core benchmark. CPU-Z 1.94 has been released with the preliminary support of the new AMD Zen 3 architecture, codenamed 'Vermeer'. Maximum possible frequency thanks to Intel Turbo Boost and AMD Turbo CORE technologies. Based on the Zen 3 core architecture and a refined version of the 7nm node, a healthy IPC gain paired with boost clocks of around 5GHz should allow for a healthy performance uplift over the existing 3000 series: Quick CPU is a real time CPU performance optimization program. As per a CPU-Z benchmark spotted by Twitter user HXL, AMD’s next-gen Ryzen 9 5900X will be as much as 25% faster in single-threaded workloads compared to its predecessor, the Ryzen 9 3900X.
0 kommentar(er)
